Task-1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph shows the impact of vaccinations on the incidence of
whooping cough, a childhood illness, between 1940 and 1990 in Britain.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Task-2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
Model answer
Task-1
The graph shows the changing number of cases of whooping cough in
Britain from 1940 to 1990, and how the introduction and use of a vaccine
for the disease affected the pattern. Apparently, there was a direct
link between the administration of the vaccine and the number of cases
of whooping cough among children during this period in history.
Overall, the number of cases fell from a high of 170,000 to almost
zero. However, there were significant fluctuations in the trend. For
example, just after 1940, there was a surge in the number of cases from
50,000 to approximately 170,000. Although the figure fell back in the
next few years, it peaked again in the early 1950s and fluctuated
considerably until the introduction of a vaccination in the late 1950s.
Following this, the number of cases dropped sharply to well below
20,000 in the mid-1970s, until a sudden fall in vaccinations, from 81
percent to 30 percent, resulted in a parallel rise in the incidence of
the illness. Figures then went up again to 60,000 around 1980, but
gradually fell back to their earlier level as vaccinations were resumed.
By 1990, 94 percent of children were being vaccinated against whooping
cough, and there were few, if any, cases.
Task-2
In recent years, the change in spending money to buy people's needs
has occurred dramatically. As a result, it always will be a
controversial topic whether it is a bad or positive trend relating to
the shopping habit which has become a routine task and even a hobby.
This essay, as my point of view, leads to, will try to come up with
several considerations as I believe that an intermediate position can be
taken relating to this issue.
Shopping, that contradicts the topic regards, is a "nightmare"
because the impacts which are dire & inevitable. Consumerism, in
some ways, contributes bad things to the society as well as the civilizations. People who overcapitalize their money can spend their
revenues in nothing and as a result, they suffer in managing their
funding and try to borrow a big amount of money for just their basic
needs. Psychologists argue that addiction in shopping which creates
consumerism behaviour can lead to several criminal dire effects such as
robbery and stealing.
However, without shopping and its relating things governments will
face the problem in controlling the economy. The thing which can grow
the Gross Domestic Products indicator is expenditures, especially the
private one. Without increasing in this indicator, there will be severe
implications which the economist called unemployment. The improvement of
spending money indicates that people in the country are wealthy and
also projects the prosperity of the nation which influences the
corporations to produce products in high quantity as well as high
quality. Throughout this trend, the employers will try to provide
immense chances for people to get their job in the corporations. As
consequences, spending in buying products, even it is a hobby or not,
with larger portions helps economy matters indirectly.
To sum up, having considered the discussion above, I believe it will
always create both positive and negative impacts, but shopping habit
can be useful if the shoppers expend their money wisely.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph shows the impact of vaccinations on the incidence of whooping cough, a childhood illness, between 1940 and 1990 in Britain.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the impact of vaccinations on the incidence of whooping cough, a childhood illness, between 1940 and 1990 in Britain.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Task-2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
Model answer
Task-1
The graph shows the changing number of cases of whooping cough in
Britain from 1940 to 1990, and how the introduction and use of a vaccine
for the disease affected the pattern. Apparently, there was a direct
link between the administration of the vaccine and the number of cases
of whooping cough among children during this period in history.
Overall, the number of cases fell from a high of 170,000 to almost
zero. However, there were significant fluctuations in the trend. For
example, just after 1940, there was a surge in the number of cases from
50,000 to approximately 170,000. Although the figure fell back in the
next few years, it peaked again in the early 1950s and fluctuated
considerably until the introduction of a vaccination in the late 1950s.
Following this, the number of cases dropped sharply to well below
20,000 in the mid-1970s, until a sudden fall in vaccinations, from 81
percent to 30 percent, resulted in a parallel rise in the incidence of
the illness. Figures then went up again to 60,000 around 1980, but
gradually fell back to their earlier level as vaccinations were resumed.
By 1990, 94 percent of children were being vaccinated against whooping
cough, and there were few, if any, cases.
Task-2
In recent years, the change in spending money to buy people's needs
has occurred dramatically. As a result, it always will be a
controversial topic whether it is a bad or positive trend relating to
the shopping habit which has become a routine task and even a hobby.
This essay, as my point of view, leads to, will try to come up with
several considerations as I believe that an intermediate position can be
taken relating to this issue.
Shopping, that contradicts the topic regards, is a "nightmare"
because the impacts which are dire & inevitable. Consumerism, in
some ways, contributes bad things to the society as well as the civilizations. People who overcapitalize their money can spend their
revenues in nothing and as a result, they suffer in managing their
funding and try to borrow a big amount of money for just their basic
needs. Psychologists argue that addiction in shopping which creates
consumerism behaviour can lead to several criminal dire effects such as
robbery and stealing.
However, without shopping and its relating things governments will
face the problem in controlling the economy. The thing which can grow
the Gross Domestic Products indicator is expenditures, especially the
private one. Without increasing in this indicator, there will be severe
implications which the economist called unemployment. The improvement of
spending money indicates that people in the country are wealthy and
also projects the prosperity of the nation which influences the
corporations to produce products in high quantity as well as high
quality. Throughout this trend, the employers will try to provide
immense chances for people to get their job in the corporations. As
consequences, spending in buying products, even it is a hobby or not,
with larger portions helps economy matters indirectly.
To sum up, having considered the discussion above, I believe it will
always create both positive and negative impacts, but shopping habit
can be useful if the shoppers expend their money wisely.
Write at least 250 words.
In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
Overall, the number of cases fell from a high of 170,000 to almost
zero. However, there were significant fluctuations in the trend. For
example, just after 1940, there was a surge in the number of cases from
50,000 to approximately 170,000. Although the figure fell back in the
next few years, it peaked again in the early 1950s and fluctuated
considerably until the introduction of a vaccination in the late 1950s.
Following this, the number of cases dropped sharply to well below 20,000 in the mid-1970s, until a sudden fall in vaccinations, from 81 percent to 30 percent, resulted in a parallel rise in the incidence of the illness. Figures then went up again to 60,000 around 1980, but gradually fell back to their earlier level as vaccinations were resumed. By 1990, 94 percent of children were being vaccinated against whooping cough, and there were few, if any, cases.
However, without shopping and its relating things governments will face the problem in controlling the economy. The thing which can grow the Gross Domestic Products indicator is expenditures, especially the private one. Without increasing in this indicator, there will be severe implications which the economist called unemployment. The improvement of spending money indicates that people in the country are wealthy and also projects the prosperity of the nation which influences the corporations to produce products in high quantity as well as high quality. Throughout this trend, the employers will try to provide immense chances for people to get their job in the corporations. As consequences, spending in buying products, even it is a hobby or not, with larger portions helps economy matters indirectly.
To sum up, having considered the discussion above, I believe it will always create both positive and negative impacts, but shopping habit can be useful if the shoppers expend their money wisely.
In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.
To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?
Model answer
Task-1
The graph shows the changing number of cases of whooping cough in
Britain from 1940 to 1990, and how the introduction and use of a vaccine
for the disease affected the pattern. Apparently, there was a direct
link between the administration of the vaccine and the number of cases
of whooping cough among children during this period in history.
Overall, the number of cases fell from a high of 170,000 to almost
zero. However, there were significant fluctuations in the trend. For
example, just after 1940, there was a surge in the number of cases from
50,000 to approximately 170,000. Although the figure fell back in the
next few years, it peaked again in the early 1950s and fluctuated
considerably until the introduction of a vaccination in the late 1950s.The graph shows the changing number of cases of whooping cough in Britain from 1940 to 1990, and how the introduction and use of a vaccine for the disease affected the pattern. Apparently, there was a direct link between the administration of the vaccine and the number of cases of whooping cough among children during this period in history.
Following this, the number of cases dropped sharply to well below 20,000 in the mid-1970s, until a sudden fall in vaccinations, from 81 percent to 30 percent, resulted in a parallel rise in the incidence of the illness. Figures then went up again to 60,000 around 1980, but gradually fell back to their earlier level as vaccinations were resumed. By 1990, 94 percent of children were being vaccinated against whooping cough, and there were few, if any, cases.
Task-2
In recent years, the change in spending money to buy people's needs has occurred dramatically. As a result, it always will be a controversial topic whether it is a bad or positive trend relating to the shopping habit which has become a routine task and even a hobby. This essay, as my point of view, leads to, will try to come up with several considerations as I believe that an intermediate position can be taken relating to this issue.
Shopping, that contradicts the topic regards, is a "nightmare" because the impacts which are dire & inevitable. Consumerism, in some ways, contributes bad things to the society as well as the civilizations. People who overcapitalize their money can spend their revenues in nothing and as a result, they suffer in managing their funding and try to borrow a big amount of money for just their basic needs. Psychologists argue that addiction in shopping which creates consumerism behaviour can lead to several criminal dire effects such as robbery and stealing.However, without shopping and its relating things governments will face the problem in controlling the economy. The thing which can grow the Gross Domestic Products indicator is expenditures, especially the private one. Without increasing in this indicator, there will be severe implications which the economist called unemployment. The improvement of spending money indicates that people in the country are wealthy and also projects the prosperity of the nation which influences the corporations to produce products in high quantity as well as high quality. Throughout this trend, the employers will try to provide immense chances for people to get their job in the corporations. As consequences, spending in buying products, even it is a hobby or not, with larger portions helps economy matters indirectly.
To sum up, having considered the discussion above, I believe it will always create both positive and negative impacts, but shopping habit can be useful if the shoppers expend their money wisely.
0 comments