Task-1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Write at least 150 words.
Write at least 150 words.
The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Task-2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write at least 250 words.
Write at least 250 words.
People often think about creating an ideal society, but most of the times fail in making this happen.
What is your opinion about an ideal society
How can we create an ideal society?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
To begin with, in the past, people had numerous challenges to make their country a safer place for living. In many countries, democracy had been the best type of living condition, and voting was the best device for achieving it. However, unfortunately, frauds prohibited them from becoming prosperous in this matter. As a prime example, Iranians participated many times in the national presidential elections to opt their favourable president, but their votes were not counted. Another factor is war. Unpredictably, nations faced sudden battles, affecting their lifestyles. They tried to raise their standard of living by the construction of more industries, schools, houses, and roads, while war destroyed them. In particular, whereas industrialisation had raised the Europeans’ lifestyles, they faced World War II, which demolished their country and millions of lives.
Model answer
Task-1
Personally, I don't believe that it is anyhow possible to create
one "ideal society", because too many factors are almost impossible to
align. It is to question as how we define an ideal society and whether
ideal is equated with perfectly functioning or without conflicts and
violence.
If secondly, it becomes very hard to put into a real context. It is a normal human behaviour to have distinct opinions on certain topics and to underline these with more or less eagerness. It is also natural to disagree since everyone follows different objectives and aims in life. If you compare the economic interest of a global company to the concerns of an environmental activist, it is clear that their aims sharply interfere. Our society and most of our economy is a complex structure that is built on many intertwining networks and shares contrary interests. Otherwise, if everyone was to share the same opinion on every occasion for instance, then who gets to decide, which opinion is the right one?
But is the idea of the perfect society all that distant? Even though accepting different approaches in daily situations and the fact that conflicts are a natural and normal factor in a functioning society, there are certain aspects which could change it for the better. If everyone would start the change by seeking for errors in his direct surrounding, even small improvements could have an impact on the whole population. This being said, we should raise more awareness for people in need of support and try to help wherever possible. By supporting the weakest, we can stabilize and harmonize our coexistence. Thus provide a healthier living together without exploration and imbalance.
To conclude, I strongly believe in changing the way we treat people and live together by improving our social awareness for the less privileged and offering our support whenever we can. This way the idea of an ideal society becomes more realistic. Instead of trying to avoid indifferences and conflicts, we should try to build a harmony around inevitable conflicts and be more aware of the positive sides of the wonderful community called society.
If secondly, it becomes very hard to put into a real context. It is a normal human behaviour to have distinct opinions on certain topics and to underline these with more or less eagerness. It is also natural to disagree since everyone follows different objectives and aims in life. If you compare the economic interest of a global company to the concerns of an environmental activist, it is clear that their aims sharply interfere. Our society and most of our economy is a complex structure that is built on many intertwining networks and shares contrary interests. Otherwise, if everyone was to share the same opinion on every occasion for instance, then who gets to decide, which opinion is the right one?
But is the idea of the perfect society all that distant? Even though accepting different approaches in daily situations and the fact that conflicts are a natural and normal factor in a functioning society, there are certain aspects which could change it for the better. If everyone would start the change by seeking for errors in his direct surrounding, even small improvements could have an impact on the whole population. This being said, we should raise more awareness for people in need of support and try to help wherever possible. By supporting the weakest, we can stabilize and harmonize our coexistence. Thus provide a healthier living together without exploration and imbalance.
To conclude, I strongly believe in changing the way we treat people and live together by improving our social awareness for the less privileged and offering our support whenever we can. This way the idea of an ideal society becomes more realistic. Instead of trying to avoid indifferences and conflicts, we should try to build a harmony around inevitable conflicts and be more aware of the positive sides of the wonderful community called society.
Task-2
It is true that studying the past can help us to know more about how nations had been successful in making a perfect community. Although many options can be considered for having an ideal society, I personally believe that having appropriate leaders and equal usage of resources are two important factors.To begin with, in the past, people had numerous challenges to make their country a safer place for living. In many countries, democracy had been the best type of living condition, and voting was the best device for achieving it. However, unfortunately, frauds prohibited them from becoming prosperous in this matter. As a prime example, Iranians participated many times in the national presidential elections to opt their favourable president, but their votes were not counted. Another factor is war. Unpredictably, nations faced sudden battles, affecting their lifestyles. They tried to raise their standard of living by the construction of more industries, schools, houses, and roads, while war destroyed them. In particular, whereas industrialisation had raised the Europeans’ lifestyles, they faced World War II, which demolished their country and millions of lives.
0 comments